THE FRENCH BLUEPRINT IN VIETNAM

By Becca Newman

From the late 19th to the mid-20th century, France colonized Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia under French Indochina, reshaping the region’s political, economic, and cultural landscape. While framed as a "civilizing mission," French rule in Vietnam was driven by economic exploitation, geopolitical control, and the spread of European influence. Yet, it also fueled the nationalist movements that would eventually end colonial rule. Today, the legacy of French colonization remains visible in Vietnam, influencing its language, education, and diplomatic ties with France and the wider world.

Vietnam’s History of French Colonization

Before French colonization, Vietnam maintained a decentralized political system, where village leaders held authority, and the emperor’s role was often symbolic. This governance model had withstood external influences for centuries, particularly from China. However, French colonial rule systematically dismantled indigenous political structures, imposing a centralized administration that reduced the autonomy of local leaders and forced Vietnamese officials into subordinate roles (Digital History, n.d.). The introduction of the Napoleonic Code further displaced traditional Vietnamese legal systems, reinforcing colonial control rather than integrating local customs. These changes fueled deep resentment, particularly among the Vietnamese elite, who found themselves excluded from positions of real power.

Beyond governance, France’s economic policies were designed to maximize profits for French enterprises at the expense of local populations. Under Governor-General Paul Doumer (1897–1902), the colonial economy was structured to ensure financial self-sufficiency for Indochina; though in reality, this translated to intensified economic exploitation. Large amounts of rubber plantations, coal mines, and rice exports generated immense wealth for French companies while subjecting Vietnamese workers to brutal labor conditions. High taxes, land seizures, and state-controlled monopolies, particularly in the lucrative opium trade, exacerbated economic disparities (Khan Academy, n.d.). Though France introduced modern infrastructure such as railroads and ports, these developments primarily served colonial extraction rather than local economic advancement. The majority of Vietnamese people saw little benefit from these projects, which were designed to facilitate resource exploitation rather than improve indigenous livelihoods.

At the same time, France’s cultural agenda reinforced its dominance. Catholic missionaries, protected and supported by the colonial administration, actively focused on converting the Vietnamese population. By promoting Christianity, they hoped to diminish Confucian and Buddhist traditions, positioning European cultural norms as superior (Pac Forum, 2022). Education was also a tool of colonization as French schools were established to create a Francophone elite who could serve as intermediaries between the colonial government and the local population. However, this policy had unintended consequences as many educated Vietnamese, exposed to Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality, began to question the legitimacy of French rule. Figures such as Ho Chi Minh, who studied in France, would later turn these principles against the colonial system, leading the movement for Vietnamese independence.

Vietnam’s Resistance and the Path to Independence

While French rule faced opposition from the beginning, resistance escalated in the early 20th century. Nationalist movements, initially fragmented, gained support and cohesion as French economic and political oppression deepened. The most significant of these was the Việt Minh, a communist-led coalition that fought for independence. Their efforts culminated in the First Indochina War (1946–1954), a brutal conflict that ultimately ended with the decisive Battle of Điện Biên Phủ. The French defeat in this battle forced them to negotiate the Geneva Accords, marking the end of colonial rule in Indochina (Digital History, n.d.). However, rather than bringing stability, the accords divided Vietnam into North and South, setting the stage for further conflict, including the eventual U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.

Ironically, many of the tools the French had used to strengthen their colonial grip also contributed to their downfall. The very educational institutions that were supposed to create loyal colonial subjects instead produced intellectuals who challenged colonial authority. Similarly, the infrastructure projects designed for resource extraction inadvertently facilitated communication and transportation for nationalist resistance networks. Moreover, exposure to French political philosophy gave Vietnamese leaders ideological frameworks to articulate their demands for self-determination (The Diplomat, 2018).

France’s Role in Contemporary Vietnam

Although France’s direct control over Vietnam ended in 1954, there are still remains of cultural and diplomatic influence. Rather than cutting ties, France transitioned from colonial rule to practicing soft power, relying on cultural diplomacy, educational partnerships, and trade agreements to maintain relevance in the region. Vietnam remains a member of the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF), which seeks to promote the French language in former colonies. Institutions like the Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF) continue to support French-language education through scholarships and academic partnerships. However, the role of French in Vietnam has diminished significantly. English has emerged as the dominant language of business, diplomacy, and global engagement, reducing France’s linguistic leverage in the region (Pac Forum, 2022).

Beyond language, France has tried to maintain a foothold in Vietnam through economic and security partnerships. Trade agreements such as the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA) have allowed for cooperation, particularly in sectors such as agriculture, technology, and renewable energy. France has also positioned itself as an alternative defense partner, as Vietnam looks to diversify its military alliances beyond traditional reliance on Russia. However, the high cost of French military equipment remains a barrier to deeper defense cooperation.

Despite these efforts, France’s influence in Vietnam and in the ASEAN region has become increasingly tenuous. ASEAN’s strategic alignment has shifted toward economic powerhouses like China, the United States, and Japan, leaving France struggling to maintain relevance. While soft power initiatives, such as cultural and educational diplomacy, remain important, they are no longer sufficient to secure France’s position in the region. If France hopes to sustain its influence, it must offer tangible benefits in trade, security, and technological innovation, aligning its strategies with ASEAN’s priorities rather than relying solely on historical ties.

As Vietnam continues to assert itself on the global stage, France faces a critical choice: adapt to the evolving geopolitical landscape or risk becoming a marginal player in the region. Whether through economic investment, diplomatic engagement, or security cooperation, France’s ability to remain relevant will depend on how well it responds to the shifting dynamics of Southeast Asia… where history alone is no longer enough to guarantee influence.

Works Cited

Digital History. (n.d.). Responses to Colonialism. Retrieved from https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu

Khan Academy. (n.d.). Responses to Industrial Imperialism. Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org

Pac Forum. (2022). Southeast Asia: The Great Forgotten of French Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://pacforum.org

The Diplomat. (2018). Don’t Forget France in Laos. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com